Steve and Me and the Women of the Trees

Rene' and Mark Munger at FOT 2011

 

I’ve done the Festival of Trees (FOT), an event sponsored by the Junior League of Duluth, ever since I became a published author. My first novel, The Legacy was published by Savage Press of Superior, WI in October of 2000. That November, I sat in the Savage Press booth during the FOT and sold books alongside the owner of the press, Mike Savage. I did so well that, the next year, I had my own booth space. Over the ten years CRP has been a presence at the craft show, it has done well. I’ve sold hundreds of books to folks (mostly women). This year’s event, sad to say, was not very productive.

Now, I’ll readily admit, that part of the problem is that I haven’t had a new book released since Mr. Environment: The Willard Munger Story came out in March of 2009. So It’s been over two years since a new “Munger” product has been released. And book buyers, whether they are purchasing for themselves or others, want a new book, something unique and never-before-seen, to either read themselves or give as a gift. I get that. But, with stock of four book titles on hand (out of eight), one might assume that there would be something for everyone interested in buying a book even without a new title. But it’s more than that, dear readers. It’s also, as someone during a debate once said, “It’s the economy, stupid.” To be fair to the estrogen-driven female shoppers at this year’s FOT, I’d say my poor sales this year are a combination of not having “new” on hand to entice shoppers and the hard economic times we find ourselves in. I can remedy the first problem by releasing a new book (though, right now, I can’t afford to print it). But, like President Obama and Congress, I am clueless as to how to turn our dismal economy around.

 

Rene's Benches FOT 2011 CRP Booth

 

Thinking  about this weekend (two days of not many sales), maybe there’s more to this story than just product fatigue and global economic malaise. I come to this conclusion because, as the title to this piece says, I spent much of the weekend in my booth with Steve Jobs. No, I didn’t become delusional as I sat alone, waiting for customers, asking the perennial question I always ask: “Did John Grishom start this way?” (Actually, he did. A Time to Kill, his first effort, was self-published and languished in boxes in his basement until The Firm went ballistic.) I was reading, as I always do during down time at festivals, and my book of choice was the new biography of Apple icon and founder, Steve Jobs. I’ll save the review of the book for another blog but, suffice it to say, with all Jobs’s peculiarities, there’s one thing that has impressed me about the man’s story so far: He was always concerned with the aesthetics and the utility of his products. Keeping them beautiful and simple, while retaining functionality, was and is the hallmark of Apple’s product line. Reading the book got me to thinking (always dangerous, as my wife will attest): What if Cloquet River Press adopted the same business philosophy? What if, instead of perennially hitting my head against the wall, trying to break into a mainstream publisher through force of will, churning out manuscripts, sending out queries to agents and small presses, I simply took a step back, gathered my breath, and changed how Cloquet River Press does business? Interesting. What if, instead of trying to do things that big publishers are very, very good at (though their profit margins suck these days due to the onset of e-readers), like getting books into bookstores for strangers to read, I concentrate on my loyal fans, as small a base as that may be, and simply give them the best product I can produce? What if, when the next Munger book is released, it is done not with an eye towards pushing Mark Munger to a new level, but is released on a limited print basis (with e-book versions on all the major platforms) so that, in the end, I am not running hither and tither trying to sell books in the rain beneath my beloved EZ-Up? Craft shows were once the mainstay of what I did to sell books. Over the past three years, that avenue to sales has, even with a new book on the table (Mr Environment) dried up. Maybe the message that is being sent is: “Munger, it’s time to re-think, to re-vision what it is you’re trying to do.”

Over the next year, I will ponder more and travel less in an attempt to figure out what model makes the most sense for CRP. I’m tired of swinging for the fence only to hit pop flies: Better to wait for the right pitch and take a single. Steve Jobs likely wouldn’t be happy with that analogy: He’d urge me to swing for the fence. But in this changing world of print media, with a down economy and all the uncertainty of what tomorrow will bring, maybe taking a deep breath and actually thinking about where I want to be with my writing and my stories is the right thing to do.

Peace.

Mark

 

Posted in Blog Archive | Comments Off on Steve and Me and the Women of the Trees

Moll Doesn’t Satisfy…

 

 

Moll Flanders by Daniel Defoe (2005. Barnes and Noble Classics. ISBN 978-1-59308-216-1)

One of the classics or it wouldn’t be included in B&N’s trade paperback library, right? Well, Moll Flanders appears to have been included in the bookstore giant’s series of “great” novels because, as the editor of the B&N edition of the novel writes:

If we define the novel in the way we are used to thinking about fiction-as a prose narrative of substantial length that makes a pretense of reporting life in a form human beings might well have imagined to have lived it-Defoe surely stakes a claim as the first English novelist…

(p.xiii, ibid, Michael Seidel)

Purported to be, as the subtitle states, The Fortunes and Misfortunes of the Famous Moll Flanders (a fictional biography of a woman born to poverty in Newgate Prison, whose only chance, as a child, of a safe and honorable upbringing disappears like morning vapor on a Welsh moor) this book attempts (to recreate in fiction) depictions of English poverty and class disadvantage painted far more honestly and credibly by Charles Dickens in Oliver Twist and Bleak House. Now, some might argue the book’s failings arise from the language Defoe wrote in: late 17th and early 18th century English, a form of English that is so archaic, so outmoded that four hundred years later  the language itself is the main issue with the novel. I would disagree. Think of more recent works of fiction, such as Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Hurston. That novel is embedded with a twisted distortion of English derived from the Deep South that many might find difficult, if not impossible, to negotiate. And yet, to this day, Their Eyes retains its vigor and its passion as a great read. Certainly, the distance of time makes works of fiction less relevant. And certainly, in comparison to Moll Flanders, Their Eyes is a relative newborn. But in the end, I have to disagree that it is the language of Defoe’s novel that makes the book less than satisfactory.

A great novel, whether contemporary, literary, science fiction, or romance lives or dies upon the shoulders, broad or narrow, of its plot and characters. And that’s just it: In my view, the shoulders that this story rests upon are too narrow to carry the weight of the book’s narrative. There are far too many coincidences, too many pat plot devices, too many escapes from the noose experienced by Moll Flanders along the way to make the story ring true. Would, at a time when children were executed for stealing, a matronly thief (with a long history of deception, prostitution, lies, thievery, and other law-breaking) really escape the noose as Moll does towards the end of story? (This isn’t a spoiler alert: Since the book is written in first person, we know from page 1 that Moll will survive her travails.) Doubtful. This is but one of many, many purported “ah ah” moments in the plot that seem contrived. Then there is the character of Moll herself: One moment seemingly honest and hard-working and ready to redeem herself, and the next, ready to steal from the house down the street. Complex characters are great: No villain is totally evil and no hero is totally good. But if a character is to possess such multiple layers, these nuances need to be explained in context and revealed in depth. Such revelations do not occur (with respect to Moll’s character) in the book.

Overall, this novel amounts to a chronicle of an incident-driven fictional life with little, if any, genuine exposition of character.

3 stars out of 5.

 

Posted in Books | Comments Off on Moll Doesn’t Satisfy…

Why we hit the Road

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blue Guitar Highway by Paul Metsa (2011. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-7642-2)

Bob Dylan. Mark Knopfler. Nils Logfren. Bruce Springsteen. Tom Waits.

You’re asking: “Munger, what the hell do those guys have to do with you writing a review about Minnesota’s hardest working, less-than-a-household-name, guitar slinging Iron Range boy, Paul Metsa?” Fair question, dear reader. Fair question. Well, immediately after finishing Metsa’s memoir of the road, Blue Guitar Highway, having read numerous passages depicting Metsa’s home in North Minneapolis as a virtual library of pressed vinyl, I was so moved by the book, I began pulling out my old LPs: records I haven’t played in at least a decade and started listening to music the way it should be listened to: Pillow under my head, flat on my back, a nice Merlot in hand, the volume way up, and no one else home. Oh, the journey Metsa paints with words isn’t always as pretty or succinct (a couple of scenes were repeated, leaving me with the sense that a bit more editing would have made the book even better), and, as someone else has written, Paul tends to be a name dropper (by repeatedly telling us whom, amongst the gods of rock, folk, blues, and jazz he’s shared a stage with). But in the end, for a first time author of a piece of substantial length, Metsa mostly hits the right notes. In fact, there are portions of the prose that fairly sing, that are as good as it gets in rendering a contemporary life on the page. Consider this passage, towards the end of the book:

Backstage were the musicians-the performers and listeners-who were there to enjoy the evening along with the crowd that was now arriving from all directions. Wherever lifer musicians gather the bonds are felt-those who know the decades of blasts of glory, music itself a life-lasting love. Followed by rejection, broken-down cars, the times in sickness and in health, other band members, friends at first, only in it for the money (like there ever was any) who will jump ship for a few dollars more. The slow suicide of drugs and booze that lurks in the guise of midnight angels and  whiskey queens, sirens who call from corners with the dove-like eyes of your first true love, but the intent of prostitutes who follow the feet of their victims in the quicksand of slow and meaningless death. Bar owners, booking agents, and record labels that could give a good goddamn. Audiences more interested in pinball or pool tables or television screens, the band on the stage nothing but a bother. Death and destruction, love many times lost, and the occasional one-night stand hotter than the skillet of a New Orleans short-order cook…Or real love with a human touch made to last with lovers sometimes drawn from opposite magnetic poles that proved marriage was possible and strong like David’s slingshot against the Goliath that was the music business, sweeter than honey…Building families that stand the test of time and kids that are now musicians themselves. Or the kids who never knew Daddy’s name, and some only remembering it as long as child support was paid on time, the waiting for that to come around, as music is nothing if not the discipline of hope. And all the rest-the poison gigs and the majestic ones that vanish as quickly as they came, all the things you could only wish would happen but would never bet on-that reminded us why were here in the first place, like black-robed priests who take an oath of poverty…whose faces we never saw but whose presence we always felt…

(p. 251, Blue Guitar Highway)

See what I mean? Metsa uses his talents as a songwriter and lyricist to full advantage. His prose sets us to laughing, crying, and remembering often within the same sentence. Honesty (regarding Metsa’s success as a musician and in his personal life) drips onto the pages of this hard-wrought memorial like sweat from The Boss on a great night on the stage. Sure, as some critics have complained, there’s some gratuitous name dropping here and there in the story. Teaching Bruce Springsteen the three chords of a Woody Guthrie song before playing en masse in a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame tribute to Woody. Is that incident significant enough to record for posterity? Sure it is if, as is likely, this is your one opportunity to tell your story. The fact that Springsteen asked and Metsa answered, yeah, I’d say that’s worthy of reportage, in an honest, off-hand sort of way. Which is exactly the way it comes off in the passage. Those who have criticized the occasional name dropping (or, in the case of one insensitive jerk ( Michael Adams) in his Amazon.com “review”, Metsa’s creds as a musician) are missing the point of this journey: Paul Metsa is not Bob Dylan. Hate to confuse you folks, but Metsa doesn’t claim he wrote anything as world changing as “Blowing in the Wind” or altered the face of music by his work on the stage. What he’s chronicling (to steal the title to Dylan’s own memoir) is something that this writer is very familiar with: The day to day grind of trying to make a name for yourself in the ever-confusing, cut-throat world of popular culture and art. Just like Metsa, I’ve logged tens of thousands, nay, likely hundreds of thousands of miles, hawking my books in the U.S., Canada, and Finland. And I’ve only been at it ten years. Metsa has been walking the Blue Guitar Highway for over forty years. And he’s done it despite rejection, personal loss, money woes, dependency demons, and all the other gremlins that leap up to smack an artist down. There is tremendous value in this story of sweat and blood and tears: It lets the rest of the world know, those folks that think you simply pen a song or a novel and toss it towards an agent and become instantly famous and wealthy, that such stories are fantasy and don’t bear any resemblance to the grit and toil of the real world of a musician, artist, or writer.

In a nutshell: This memoir belongs on any music fan’s bookshelf. It’s sitting on mine, as I finish this review, next to Dylan’s Chronicles, David Crosby’s Long Time Gone, Neil Young’s Shakey, and Guthrie’s Bound for Glory. Metsa has captured a life not yet completed: Let’s hope he tells us more.

4 and 1/2 stars out of 5.

(Note: Buy this book and, if you like what you read, log on to: http://www.amazon.com/Blue-Guitar-Highway-Paul-Metsa/dp/0816676429/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1321106475&sr=8-1-fkmr0 and add your review. I’m serious: Michael Adams, whoever the hell he is, trashed Metsa for no apparent reason. There’s no substance, no actual critique of the book contained in Adams’s review, and yet, Adams felt sufficiently mean-spirited to give the book one star. Peruse my book reviews on this site: The only book I’ve ever given one star was The Book of Mormon! Not for its content but for its readability. Give an honest assessment of Blue Guitar Highway on Amazon because, in my view,  a one star rating wrongfully diminishes the beauty and value of the book.)

 

 

Posted in Books | Comments Off on Why we hit the Road

11/11/11

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place: and in the sky
The larks still bravely singing fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the dead: Short days ago,
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved: and now we lie
In Flanders fields!

Take up our quarrel with the foe
To you, from failing hands, we throw
The torch: be yours to hold it high
If ye break faith with us who die,
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields

(Composed at the battlefront on May 3, 1915  during the second battle of Ypres, Belgium by Lt. Col. John McCrae, British Expeditionary Force)

Graves of the Lost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The guns fell silent 93 years ago today. On the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month of 1918, the fifth year of the devastation and destruction that defined the so-called Great War, the fighting stopped, men and boys at arms stood down, and WWI was over. Though political intrigue and fighting would continue in places like Finland, Estonia, Russia, and the Middle East as world leaders tried to redraw and redefine the global map, with the Armistice, the war was declared “over” and American soldiers, sailors, and Marines (who, in the last year of the war had been deployed to shore up the French, British, Italian, Canadian and other allied forces against the Germans and Austrians) began to dream of returning home.

Home.

I sit this Armistice Day (renamed “Veteran’s Day” to honor all of the men and women who have fallen defending America across time) in the comfort of my little writing studio along the banks of the Cloquet River in northeastern Minnesota, never having fired a shot at another human being; never having clawed my way through mud on my belly in the face of combat; never having experienced the utter terror and degradation of war on a personal level. Oh, I served ever-so-briefly. My career as an Army Reservist was undistinguished and of short duration. It did not involve watching my friends and my enemies die. It involved typing at a unit typewriter (you remember typewriters, I’m sure) at a cozy desk in a warm office in Fort Snelling. But, despite my innocence, my naivete with respect to the horrors of combat, I think I understand. But of course, as interview after interview with the vanishing heroes of another war (members of, as Tom Brokaw proclaimed, “The Greatest Generation”) have revealed I know nothing about war. So I will not pretend, as I sit contentedly in my bathrobe sipping hot coffee and listening to classical music as I type this piece, to understand what our young men and women in uniform posted in Iraq and Afghanistan are experiencing. I cannot relate to their reality any more than I can relate to the experiences of Frank Buckles and the other young men who stood the trenches on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month so many years ago.

Frank Buckles, last WWI Veteran

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And now, they are all gone. Buckles was the last: The last American veteran of WWI. He died this year. He died, in some ways, unhappy: He had lobbied, to the end of his days, for a memorial to be erected to honor those who fought and died (improvident as the war might have been) as Americans under arms in the Great War. Perhaps it is too distant a time, too far a journey back, for the public to care enough (or at all) about their service. But Buckles cared: He knew the terror, the blood, the horrors of trench warfare and its impact on those who survived and how, for nearly five years, political forces on both sides of the conflict moved young men around strategically, like pieces manuevered by chess masters, with little regard for their dignity or their lives. They called it the Great War: Those who served and saw would tell you that there was nothing magnificent or heroic about it at all, that in the end, twenty million human beings (more than six million of that number were civilians) died because of a madman’s political insult. And though, in some ways, WWI was the end, for empires and old alliances, it was also the beginning: Science and technology impacted the way men would kill each other in that, for the very first time, masses of humanity could be dispatched from a distance by the use of modern weaponry. Despite the distance of time, on this eleventh day, of the eleventh month, of the eleventh year of a new century, how much, dear readers, has really changed? How much have we humans really learned?

Today, take a moment away from your coffee cups, from your cozy enclaves, from the safety and security of your existence here at home and say a prayer, or recite a poem, or simply remain silent in honor of those boys who stood (and still stand) the trenches, and for the women who minister to the wounded, guard our positions, and transport our troops. Whether you believe we need to be in Iraq and Afghanistan isn’t the issue. When you remember the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month remember this as well: We asked and they said “yes”.

American men and women who serve in uniform should be honored (for doing what the rest of us cannot or will not do) regardless of our personal politics.

 

Peace.

Mark

Posted in Blog Archive | 2 Comments

Hunting without Grandpa…

The Judge lugging back a rooster pheasant somewhere north of Ashley.

When you’re nearly 84 and your doctor tells you, “Sorry, Harry, but you’re not going to be able to go” a few days before a scheduled hunting trip with your son, two of your grandsons, and your lifelong buddy, well, that doesn’t light up your day. That’s what happened to my old man about a week ago. He and I went down to the Eleanor Mondale Memorial Service in the Twin Cities so he could pay his last respects to the daughter of one of his oldest fishing pals, former Vice President Fritz Mondale. Somewhere along the way, grandpa caught a nasty bug that turned into pneumonia serious enough that it landed him in St. Luke’s Hospital for a week and ended his hopes of joining me, my sons Chris and Matt, and Bruce out in Ashley, ND for our annual pheasant hunt. It was a bummer but, when your doctor, a guy who’s saved your life a few times, tells you, “No”, you have to listen.

The Munger boys aren’t the best shots. We aren’t the smartest or the hardest working hunters. But, over the past five years that we’ve joined my old man out on the Dakota prairie, we’ve always managed to find a few rooster pheasants, the odd sharptail grouse or two and even hit them on occasion. We’ve watched innumerable sunrises and sunsets over soybeans, corn, and sunflowers. We’ve tromped through ditches and hedgerows and swales until our boots were caked in mud and our wool socks were soaked. We’ve tried to sneak up on ever-elusive and diminutive Hungarian partridge, blue-gray birds not much larger than pigeons that favor open fields devoid of crops. We’ve watched wave after wave of sandhill cranes circle high above us, geese soar in gigantic ballet-style formations, and flocks of fast flying mallards and teal race with the wind to the next prairie pothole. This year didn’t prove to be any different even without Dad: Our aim hadn’t improved and, despite a sense of bitter-sweetness to the trip without grandpa, we had a whale of a good time.

Matt, my eldest son, was our chef. He and his wife Lisa (newly expecting my first grandchild: I call her Emily but I doubt that’s gonna stick) did all the grocery shopping for us. Chris was assigned the job of cleaning any birds we managed to shoot. I was the dishwasher. And Bruce? Absent his perennial hunting partner, Bruce continued on in his role as philosopher and guide, pouring over the public lands maps depicting places near Ashley available to hunt. After a day of seeing virtually no birds, we used Bruce’s expertise to find other spots to hunt: We found success, even in a year of poor rooster production (the result of two bad winters and a very wet spring), at least, success in the Munger sense of the word. We shot enough roosters to keep Chris plucking every night when we returned bone tired to the little frame house we rented in the center of town. We ate well, had a couple of cold Leinnies, swapped stories, hit the rack early, and, in the morning, got up to go at it again.

Chris brought his pal’s Springer spaniel, Windsor, along for the hunt. Matt brought his beloved Lexie, a spoiled, but well-mannered bronze colored Labrador retriever. Hunting over dogs in a stiff autumnal breeze beneath the open skies of the North Dakota was a pleasure. There’s nothing like watching a good dog like Windsor lock up tight on a rooster sitting in a patch of sedge grass no bigger than a loaf of bread. The human eye can’t see the bird: But you learn to trust the dog’s nose. Windsor was unrelenting, a bundle of nervous energy, bounding over high grass, cattails, and weeds on the trail of birds. Lexie was methodical but equally effective: In one day, she found, locked on, and retrieved all three roosters we hit. Not that Windsor wasn’t working: Lexie just happened to be the dog of the moment.

Of course, with modern technology, Grandpa Harry kept in touch, calling us every night for a post-hunt update. You could sense the lament, the longing in his voice when he’d call. Though he loves his friend and care-taker Pauline dearly and enjoys her company immensely, he’d waited all summer for our annual trip. Not to be with us was, in a word, heartbreaking. Being that we’re guys, that word was never spoken: You just knew that was the case from the tone of the old man’s voice.

Our last day, we came upon a small covey of Hungarian partridge. We don’t see a lot of Huns where we hunt, though every couple years, we run into them. Usually, the birds are far off, out in the middle of sown crop, nibbling left over soybeans or corn, far out of range. I think we’ve had one or two shots at Huns over the years but never hit one. They are, to use my son Chris’s analogy, my Holy Grail. So when I saw Huns pecking away on remnant beans half a football field away, I wanted them bad. But the birds saw us long before we could get in range. And so, we tromped the edge of a big mown field alongside a huge lake, hoping to coax a rooster out of cover. A mile later, all we had for our effort was the sight of one skittish hen pheasant (off limits to hunters) flying low over weeds.

“I’ll bet those damn Huns are back by Bruce, eating again,” I said aloud, though my two sons were trudging over the wasteland left by the bean harvester too far from me to hear. “And Bruce is likely snoozing in his car.”

Damn if I wasn’t right. Neither of my sons saw them but I did: My little beauties were, as predicted, clucking and picking and eating to their hearts’ content just fifty yards away from Bruce’s Toyota Highlander. Bruce, never one to waste energy, was sitting behind the steering wheel, reading a map, totally oblivious to the Holy Grail just outside his car.

“Huns,” I whispered loudly, gesturing emphatically towards the blue-gray specks ahead of us.

My sons understood. The dogs, though they were working into the wind, hadn’t picked up the scent of the covey. Windsor was by my side though he kept trying to stray. I held him in close by command so as not to spook the Huns. All three of us walked slowly, our shotguns at the ready, making ourselves as small as possible in a completely naked field that rolled to the south for better than a mile. I kept my eyes glued on the birds. The Hun closest to me became skittish, opening and closing its wings as if making ready to fly.

Now or never.

I eased the bead of my 12 gauge over-under on the nearest bird, clicked off the safety, and raised the barrel.

Boom.

Boom. Boom. Boom.

The Huns flew away unscathed.

“My fault,” I said apologetically as I joined my sons. “I shot too soon.”

“Damn straight, Pops,” Chris said. “What were you thinking?”

“I wasn’t,” I admitted.

There was little reason to continue the discussion. I’d messed up. Not the first time, won’t be the last. But through all the noise and commotion, Bruce hadn’t moved: His eyes were riveted on the map in his hands. He had no idea the Holy Grail had been just outside his windshield.

Later that evening, I had the chance for redemption. We were driving back to the house on a dirt road near dusk when a big rooster pheasant rose from the ditch and settled in a patch of saw grass next to standing corn.

“That’s your bird, Dad,” Chris said. “He didn’t make the corn.”

I exited Matt’s truck, let Windsor out of his kennel and a flock of pheasants ran across the road behind the Nissan headed for open country.

“More birds. You take Lexie after them. I’ll take Windsor after the rooster.”

We split up. Windsor bounded over thick ditch grass and worked the edge of the corn. The dead stalks swayed and cracked in a slow wind. The sun was setting above the horizon in the west, its gold and orange glow casting magic over the land. Windsor stopped dead, his wet nose pushed into cattails. A cackle split the cooling air. A rooster pheasant rose from thick cover next to an open pond. It’s wings glinted in the dying sun. Then another bird, a hen, rose to my left. Another rooster cackled and burst into the declining sky to my right. I kept my eye on the first bird, the bird that we’d been tracking.

Boom.

The rooster tumbled and hit water. Windsor dove into the rushes. A few minutes later, he reappeared with the colorful bird in his mouth.

As I type this story on my iMac in my writing room overlooking the Cloquet River, far removed from pheasant country and the hunt, day is again breaking. Down river, I hear the bark of shotguns. Geese fly above the house, followed by flights of local mallards smart enough at this stage of the season to get the hell out of dodge. The sun is rising in the east and a clear blue sky is replacing night’s veil. I am hopeful, as I end this story, that there’s at least one more good hunt in my old man. Next year, Jack, my fourteen year old son, will come with us to Ashley. It would be great if he could hunt with his grandpa.

Peace.

Mark

Posted in Blog Archive | Comments Off on Hunting without Grandpa…

Great Crime Fiction for a Cold Autumn Night!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nothing but the Truth by Jarkko Sipila (2006. Ice Cold Crime. ISBN 978-0982444931)

A low-level drug dealer is shot, execution style at the threshold of his seedy Helsinki dive. A neighbor, a single mother with a pre-teen daughter and an abusive ex-husband, sees the getaway car and driver. She hesitates to call the Helsinki police. “Why get involved?” her boss says, urging her to remain silent. In the end, Mari Lehtonen does the right thing: She steps forward and becomes the State’s key witness in a murder investigation. But can the police protect Mari from retaliation? This is the story behind Nothing but the Truth, the latest in the “Helsinki Homicide” series from Ice Cold Crime of Independence, Minnesota.

It’s interesting reviewing an author’s work in reverse chronological order. Previously, I read and reviewed Jarkko Sipila’s more recent titles, Against the Wall (2009) and Vengeance (2010). So here I am, reviewing an earlier novel by Mr. Sipila, Nothing but the Truth (2006. Gummerus (in Finnish). 2011. Ice Cold Crime (in English). ISBN 978-0-9824449-3-1). And while Sipila’s later works have been well written and concise, the sort of tight writing one wants in a beach read (which most crime novels tend to be), they lacked the revelation of character that, for me, sets a good book apart from its competition. After reading Nothing but the Truth this past weekend, I now know that Jarkko Sipila cares about the people who populate the Helsinki of his imagination. And in this reviewer’s humble opinion, that’s a huge plus.

The cast of characters in this earlier installment of the “Helsinki Homicide” series includes some of the same folks found in Sipila’s later work, including Kari Takamäki, (a Detective Lieutenant in the Helsinki Violent Crimes Unit) and Suhonen (an aging, hockey playing undercover detective in the same unit). Sipila clearly has a fondness for Suhonen’s lone-wolf personality: The author gives the shadowy detective center stage. But the writing (unlike the two other Sipila books I’ve read) doesn’t suffer from too much action and not enough humanity: Here, Jarkko Sipila gives us a full-blooded Suhonen, a character with a complete history and personality. Consider this fine bit of writing:

Salmela took the first rod and dropped the lure into the water. It fluttered along easily next to the boat. He let out the line about fifty feet, made a small loop, and clamped it with a spring-loaded clip that had a ring for the planer leader. Salmela let out the line till the ring reached almost to the planer, then he propped the rod up in the holder.

 Within five minutes, all four lines were in the water. “Once you get a hit, the fish will jerk the clip off the line and you just reel him in. That’s it. You take the first hit. I’ll take the next. Just remember to brace yourself when you take the rod out of the holder.”

 Suhonen began to suspect that this wasn’t a friend’s boat after all. Salmela seemed to know his way around it well enough. Or maybe he had more than borrowed it…

 So the burly undercover detective enjoys an occasional day off and, though not an avid salmon fisherman, will take up a rod and reel when invited? The cited passage humanizes Suhonen, puts flesh on the bones of his character, making us care about what it is he does for a living and how he does it. This is the sort of development of a protagonist that seemed to be lacking in the Jaarko Sipila books I read and reviewed earlier. The author clearly knows how to write: It’s simply a matter of applying his skills.

Similar nuance and care is shown in how Sipila reveals Mari Lehtanen’s past, her fears, her personality. It would an easy thing to portray her ex-husband, who clearly abused Mari during their marriage, as a stereotypical, beer-swilling bastard. But Sipila takes the time to show us more, to weave the complexities of humanity into these two characters making them believable and authentic.

Another nice touch (for this American lawyer-turned-judge) was the use of the Finnish court system as a setting for a portion of the narrative. Sipila (a crime reporter in Finland) had me scrambling to verify that Finland does indeed have: a jury system (generally one law judge and three lay judges (also called jurors) for most serious criminal cases); life sentences for murder convictions; and the same burden of proof as the U.S. criminal justice system. (Sipila got that last one wrong. On p. 94 of the book, the burden of proof for conviction in Finland is depicted as “clear and convincing evidence”, a lesser standard than “beyond a reasonable doubt”, the burden applicable in Finnish criminal courts. See Heuni: The European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control in Finland (2001) @ http://www.heuni.fi/uploads/mwlahyuvuylrx.pdf, and “A Comparison of Criminal Jury Decision Rules in Democratic Countries” by Ethan Lieb (Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5:629, 2008)).

Despite this minor inaccuracy, the court scenes added much to the overall complexity and interest of the story: I’d love to see more from Jaarko Sipila in this vein. Learning something new, even from a “beach read” is never a bad thing!

For those readers who like full-throated, pedal-to-the-metal crime novels, Nothing but the Truth is a fast and furious read filled with memorable characters and plenty of action. Highly recommended.

4 and ½ stars out of 5.

(This review first appeared in the most recent edition of New World Finn. If you’re a drop of Finnish blood, or simply interested in Finnish art and culture, buy the newspaper. You can find it at: http://newworldfinn.com/.)

 

 

Posted in Books | 3 Comments

A Disappointing Novel from a Great Writing Teacher

 

 

 

 

 

Imperfect Birds by Anne Lamott (2009. Riverhead. ISBN 978-1-59448-751-4)

Anyone who is a fiction writer has read (or should read) Ms. Lamott’s classic instructional memoir about creative writing, Bird by Bird. In 237 pages, Ms. Lamott captures the heart, soul, craft, and angst of creative writing and the writing life. I love the book and have used excerpts from it in many, many workshop and lecture settings during my modest career as a semi-famous regional novelist. The examples given, the writing style, the self-depreciating tone of the book are what make Bird by Bird such an exemplary resource.

So, never having read any of the author’s fiction, when I was looking for a “stocking stuffer” for my wife last Christmas (on Christmas Eve like all marginally diligent husbands) and I saw Imperfect Birds in hardcover, I snapped it up for Rene’. I was certain that, given Ms. Lamott’s credentials as a gifted writer (fully displayed in Bird by Bird), Rene’ would love the read. Recently, when I found myself  bookless, headed towards a hot bath, and  I spied the unread copy of Lamott’s novel on my wife’s nightstand, I picked up Imperfect Birds and brought it into the steam of the master bath. In the solitude that only a hot bath can provide, I began reading the story of Elizabeth, her daughter Rosie, and James, Elizabeth’s second husband and Rosie’s stepfather. As I settled into near scalding water, I was ready to be transported; physically, emotionally, and transcendentally by Ms. Lamott’s work.

It didn’t happen.

Why? I think the reason the book fell so flat for me, in terms of character, dialogue, and setting is that the novel’s 278 pages are nearly devoid of any sort of conflict: emotional or physical. Ostensibly the story of Rosie’s senior year in high school in Marin County, CA and her descent into drug use and casual sex, the writing seems to try a bit too hard to be “hip” and relevant. (As an example: Depictions of oral sex performed by teenagers (as rewards for friendship) don’t really add much to plot unless the author is willing to connect those soulless, desperate acts with something more meaningful. In the end, casual sex is, well, simply casual and not all that interesting.) Yes, there are snippets of conflict and anger and upset between Rosie and her parents throughout the book. But none of these scenes propel the plot or the characters to a place that challenges the reader. I won’t spoil the ending but, suffice it to say, after cruising along on idle for the entirety of the story, the engine of this novel’s plot never moves towards the red line.

Bottom line: Skip this novel and, if you are aspiring author (or just someone who loves to understand what makes writers tick) buy Bird by Bird instead. It’s shorter, cheaper, and a hell of a lot more compelling.

3 stars out of five.

 

 

Posted in Books | Comments Off on A Disappointing Novel from a Great Writing Teacher

Mr. Pheasant Welcomes Willard Home…

The Misguided Munger Pheasant…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are no ring-necked pheasants in northeastern Minnesota. Never were. It’s too cold, too filled with predators, too dangerous a place for a bird so colorful. And yet, there he is, strutting around our front yard like an undersized peacock. The bird is an aberration, an anomaly, that can only be explained this way: He’s here to welcome Representative Willard Munger to Fredenberg Township.

Willard, my long-departed uncle, was a great man. I didn’t coin that phrase: His friend and associate Ann Glumac did. Her comment, taken from an article she wrote at the time of Willard’s passing in 1999 (and included in the biography I wrote about my uncle) goes like this:

In the 20 years that I knew Willard, I loved him for his humanity, his humor, his high pitched laugh, his stories, and his dedication to family and friends. I also envied him for his steadfastness in fighting for principles in a world where black and white almost always blend to gray. I’ve been privileged to meet or work with many leaders and public figures, but Willard Munger is the only great man I have ever known.

(Mr. Environment: The Willard Munger Story by Mark Munger (c) 2009)

So how can a man who’s been playing gin rummy with the saints for over ten years be coming home, to the Munger farm in rural northeastern Minnesota, you ask? And why would a pheasant show up out of the blue to greet him? The answer is simple: providence.

You see, back when I decided to write the story of my uncle’s remarkable life as Minnesota’s quintessential conservationist, taking up the keyboard only when no one else seemed interested in doing so, I was encouraged by folks who, time after time after time at art and craft shows, or bookstores, or libraries where I was hawking my fiction, would come up and urge me to write about my uncle. Many of these folks were environmental types or former Liberal politicians. Some were just good people who loved Willard. I resisted the call to write his biography for five years after his passing: I felt ill-equipped, as his nephew and young ward, to write his story. I wanted someone else to do it, to chronicle Willard’s seventy-plus years in Liberal politics because I felt too close to the subject matter to do it justice. But then, as time passed and nothing was written about Willard and his beginnings as a Farmer-Laborite, or the battles he fought as a legislator on behalf of education and the environment, I began to research and write about my uncle. The result, Mr. Environment: The Willard Munger Story was published in 2009 to some fanfare and celebration. But the book has been, in a word, a tough sell despite all the urging and prompting I received to take it on as a project. It hasn’t sold like I expected and, two and a half years later, I have a mountain of unsold copies of the book waiting for buyers.

Yes, I know, it’s partially my own damn fault. I was (as I usually am) overally optimistic. I thought that folks living in Minnesota would be interested in learning about one of their own, about a guy born in a log cabin to poverty who grew up on the northern edge of in pheasant country (Friberg Township in Otter Tail County, northwestern Minnesota); lobbied FDR during the Great Depression; managed the campaigns of Liberal icons and Minnesota governors, Floyd B. Olson and Elmer Benson; built Liberty Ships during WW II after coming to Duluth; and served nearly 50 years in the Minnesota House of Representatives as the voice of the pheasants, deer, ducks, clean water and clean air. I was wrong: I printed way too many copies out of wide-eyed eagerness and love.

For the past two and a half years, cartons of the unsold biography have been stored in an unheated pole building owned by my friend Dave. Now, I have no problem paying the going rate for storage space and, up until yesterday, that’s exactly what I did. But last night, with the help of my sons Jack and Matt, the last carton of books was hoisted and carried into a vacant bedroom of our house on the banks of the Cloquet River. The books are stacked neatly, all 115 boxes of Mr. Environment (1,600 copies), in our basement, as I patiently sell them one by one to folks who care. I’ve got time. I’m not going anywhere. And neither, unless I get to work, are the books.

I’m convinced that the good Lord knew Willard was coming to stay at our house on the river. Why else would a regal bird, with no ties to the spruce, pine, and aspen forests of St. Louis County, be hanging around our place?

Peace.

Mark

 

 

Posted in Blog Archive | Comments Off on Mr. Pheasant Welcomes Willard Home…

Say Goodbye to the EZ-UP…

The author hunkered down in his tent at Chester Bowl.

Auf Wiedersehen. Adieu. Näkemiin. Arrivederci. Goodbye. All these words fit the philosophical place where I find myself on this Sunday morning as I type this blog.

It’s drizzling outside. Soft, cold rain patters dying grass and slides over the steel siding of our farmhouse overlooking the Cloquet River. All night long, the residue of a tough week, a week spent in trial, a week spent moving 800 copies of Mr. Environment from a rented storage unit to a recently vacated bedroom in our home’s lower level (with another 800 copies awaiting similar transit), and a flurry of heavy lifting involving Rene’s concrete mosaic benches into the Pacifica for the Fall Festival in Duluth’s Chester Bowl, reminded me that this author stuff, at least the way I’ve been at it since I plunked my white EZ-Up tent down on the hard asphalt of ManyPenny Avenue at the Apple Festival in Bayfield ten Octobers ago, isn’t for the faint of heart or the weak of spine. Advil hasn’t dented the pain in my neck or the constant throbbing in my left heel, the result of too much weight, too much torque, too much lifting. After a fitful night spent on the couch trying to snare sleep, I yield: God (or common sense) has spoken.

Time to try a different approach.

Oh, yesterday at the Bowl was pleasant enough. I had some good conversations, heard familiar compliments about my writing, rekindled some friendships with readers, and chatted amiably enough with folks under a gray, autumnal sky. My sister and her family (including two of the cutest little girls in God’s creation) stopped by to say hello. Even the disaster of a little four year old trying to use one of Rene’s benches as a teeter-totter (which resulted in broken concrete and mosaic spilled over pavement) didn’t destroy the festive mood of the day. But I knew, before the day began, Chester Bowl would be the last outdoor art and craft festival. Not just for this year. Not just for this season. But forever. Last night’s fitful sleep only reinforced my decision.

I need to rethink how I market my work.

Oh, I’ll still do indoor arts and crafts shows, writers’ conferences, and try to get into bookstores, libraries, schools and the like for sales, lectures, readings, and signings. And I’ll still keep my fingers on the keyboard of my iMac churning out stories and blogs and Lord-knows-what-else. But the day of the EZ-Up is over. I met lots of fine folks, sold thousands of books, but there comes a time when all things, good, bad, or indifferent come to an end. I know that today, as I feel the bite of pain in my neck bending over the keyboard. Writing as a contact sport is beyond my reach and beyond my old body’s recuperative powers. I’ll need to find another path.

Peace.

Mark

Posted in Blog Archive | Comments Off on Say Goodbye to the EZ-UP…

A Book in Search of a Diet

 

I Hate Brett Farve/I Love Brett Farve by Ross Bernstein (2009. Triumph Books. ISBN 978-1-60078-376-0)

Every once in a while there’s a neat concept or idea, the sort of gem of a thought that makes for a dandy short story, essay, or editorial, that someone tries to inflate into a  book. That’s how I see this latest effort from Minnesota’s best known sports author, Ross Bernstein. I’ve met Ross.He’s a pleasant guy and a good writer. I even have some of his other work, like Frozen Memories, a coffee table book chronicling a century of Minnesota ice hockey. His work on his encyclopedic books is flawless. The detail is great. His research is superb. His writing is crisp. I can’t say that about this latest project from Bernstein’s fingertips: It’s, in my view, simply a cute idea that’s been expanded beyond my interest in the subject matter.

Had this book attempted to be a biography, a chronicle of the Falcon/Packer/Jet/Viking quarterback Brett Favre’s hall of fame career, painting for the reader a clear picture of what makes Farve one of the most interesting sports figures of the later 20th and early 21st centuries, well, I know Bernstein would have done the story justice. But this book, simply a compendium of comments from sportswriters, fans, and players who “hate” Farve (generally the Packer side of the ledger) and similar material from the “love” side of things (representing naive Vikings supporters) is, as I’ve said, an unwarranted expansion of an inside joke into a blotted, repetitive series of quips from folks who really have better things to do than worry about Farve’s legacy.

I guess my real issue with this effort from a writer I respect is this: In a nation and world filled with so many real conflicts, many of which are tragic and have serious consequences, using the words “love” and “hate” when dealing with a professional sports figure is, in a word, silly. Grown men and women certainly have the right to enjoy watching a good game of football or whatever during their leisure time. But to get so wrapped up in a spectator sport (as many of the folks interviewed for this volume appear to be) that you actually burn a guy’s jersey in effigy? Well (and this comes from a life-long follower of most major sports in America), that’s simply nuts. To compile a book about it that simply repeats the insanity, provides little insight into Brett Farve the man, and really doesn’t add much to popular culture.

My son Jack bought me this book, personally signed, for Christmas two years ago. It took me that long to get up the gumption to get past the subject matter and dive in. I won’t say I lament reading the book: I will say Mr. Bernstein could have said what he needed to say in about 500 words: the length of this review.

2 and 1/2 stars out of 5.

 

Posted in Books | Comments Off on A Book in Search of a Diet